Govt refuses talks with ‘sword of civil disobedience hanging’ as PTI gives mixed signals

Ali Muhammad says ready to hold dialogue but “won’t beg”; Marwat wants talks ToRs to be chalked out

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan (Left) and Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif at National Assembly floor, Islamabad, December 17, 2024. — X/@NAofPakistan
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan (Left) and Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif at National Assembly floor, Islamabad, December 17, 2024. — X/@NAofPakistan
  • Govt welcomes “pleasant breeze came for first time from PTI”.
  • Sanaullah asks PTI to approach govt for negotiations.
  • Ali Muhammad says their hands not “tainted with blood”.

ISLAMABAD: The incumbent government has ruled out talks with the embattled Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) with the “sword of civil disobedience hanging on its neck” as the former ruling party refused to “beg for negotiations”.

“For the first time, a pleasant breeze came from the opposition […] but talks cannot be held at gunpoint,” Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said while speaking on the floor of the National Assembly on Tuesday.

Incarcerated PTI founder Imran Khan — in a post on X — had warned the government of launching a “civil disobedience” movement if his demands — judicial inquiry of the May 9, 2023, riots and November 26 crackdown on PTI protesters and release of its “political prisoners” — are not met.

The ousted prime minister also constituted a five-member negotiation committee comprising Omar Ayub Khan, Ali Amin Gandapur, Sahibzada Hamid Raza, Salman Akram Raja and Asad Qaiser.

Earlier this week, the reports of the former ruling party and the government’s agreement to use the parliamentary forum for negotiation emerged following a meeting between PTI stalwart Asad Qaiser with NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq.

However, Qaiser dismissed these reports saying that he visited Sadiq’s residence for condolences. “No discussion regarding negotiations took place with the [NA] speaker,” he added. Similarly, the government has also said that no talks with the PTI have been initiated.

See also  CM Gandapur urges Imran to shun peace, warns of taking to streets with 'guns'

Speaking on the NA floor today, the defence minister lambasted the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government for prioritising marches on Islamabad instead of the Kurram clashes. “It is the provincial government’s duty to establish law and peace in their respective provinces.”

“Political responsibilities come after constitutional ones,” he said, adding that the members of national or provincial assemblies have taken an oath of allegiance to the Constitution.

Asif noted that no formal talks have been held with the Imran Khan’s party yet, emphasising that if they all belong to this House, then matters must be resolved in this building. He also termed the PTI’s formation of a negotiation committee “meaningless”, saying that nothing matters when seriousness is lacking.

Referring to the recently-held Islamabad protest, he slammed the PTI’s “double standards” for not condemning the martyrdom of Rangers and police personnel. “Who martyred the security officials […] there should be no selection in condemnation.”

Recalling his days during imprisonment, Asif said that the authorities “took away” his blanket from him in the prison at 6°C. He said he spent twelve nights at the prayer rug, but “did not beg”. “Politicians should be tolerant,” he said, adding that complaining destroys self-respect.

The minister reiterated that the repeated attacks on Islamabad and calls for civil disobedience will not pave the way for negotiations. “The nation is suffering losses in our political war,” he said, stressing the need for “a change that would create a good environment”.

PM’s aide on political affairs Rana Sanaullah — while speaking in the NA — noted that Prime Minister Shhebaz Sharif had visited the opposition benches in the assembly and expressed his willingness to hold talks with them. However, he regretted the response and tone used by Opposition Leader Omar Ayub Khan.

See also  Khawaja Asif blames judiciary for 'delay' in bringing May 9 rioters to justice

He pointed out that the special permission, granted to PTI leaders to meet the incarcerated party founder, was aimed at initiating negotiations. “But the serious efforts went in vain,” he regretted.

He further said that his party was in favour of negotiations when the then-prime minister Imran Khan “victimised” the then opposition parties. 

Sanaullah emphasised that this parliamentary democratic system cannot work until the opposition leader and leader of the house don’t sit and have a dialogue.

The adviser noted that a statement was put forward which indicated that a committee has been formed for talks, and whoever wants to hold talks can proceed. “If PTI is serious, then it should approach the government that the committee has been constituted and we want to hold talks,” he added.

He stressed that the office of the House’s speaker was a “neutral venue”. “It is as much ours as it is yours, and current speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq has always maintained his neutrality,” he added.

Mixed signals

Meanwhile, the PTI lawmakers in the lower house expressed willingness to hold talks with the government but maintained they would “not beg”. with firebrand politician Sher Afzal Marwat saying that terms of references (ToRs) should be chalked out for the negotiations.

Speaking on the NA floor, Marwat said that no negotiations would be successful unless “political forces discuss ToRs”, adding that later they should discuss the terms and references with the establishment. “Is it not possible to form a committee to resolve the issues and chalk out ToRs,” he asked.

See also  Cabinet approves amendments to colonial-era CrPC

PTI lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan, for his part, lambasted the incumbent government for “firing bullets” at the protesters in Islamabad, saying that politicians do not fire bullets, but talk.

“During our tenure, the PPP and the JUI-F held long marches but not a single bullet was fired,” he said, adding that their hands were not “tainted with blood”.

“When we did not give rights to West Pakistan, they created Bangladesh,” he said, asking what would have happened if they had been allowed to form the government. He noted that his party would not beg for talks. “If you think you can run the country by excluding Imran Khan, try it,” he added.   

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *